If you follow my blog you might have noticed that I’m going through a bit of a Hitchcock phase at the moment. I very much enjoyed The 39 Steps last week (much to my surprise and delight) but sadly I can’t say the same about this movie.
Up until this point I’ve pretty much enjoyed every Hitchcock movie I’ve ever seen: North by Northwest, Psycho, The Birds, To Catch a Thief, The Lady Vanishes etc. Psycho is a bit weird and not one of my favourites but all of them are great movies in their own right, so I was expecting The Man Who Knew Too Much to be equally good.
Before I get into the reasons for my disappointment with this movie I’ll give you a little background in case you don’t know it. Hitchcock made two different versions of the The Man Who Knew Too Much: one in 1934 starring Peter Lorre and the 1956 version I watched with Doris Day and James Stewart.
One issue I have is that none of the main characters are particularly likeable. To get involved in a story you have to have some kind of sympathy with the main characters and I found yourself actively disliking both Stewart and Day.
James Stewart plays a father whose child gets abducted to stop him revealing a secret he gets told by a dying man. He doesn’t seem to react in a particularly paternal way about this and proceeds to argue and behave unreasonably throughout the movie. This includes forcibly medicating his wife because he seems to be irritated her grief at her child being kidnapped. Doris Day on the other hand LETS herself be medicated by her overbearing husband (*rolls eyes*) and far from being the strong woman she is in most other movies she just comes across as weak, 2-dimensional and unable to do anything without her husband’s say-so.
Un the upside she does sing a cracking rendition of Whatever Will Be, Will Be (Que Sera, Sera) (which you can watch below) and wears beautiful clothes throughout. If I’m honest I hate movies that involve children (or animals) being threatened (it’s just not my idea of a good time), so that might have affected my verdict on this movie. Simply put it just wasn’t my cup of tea.
Has anyone seen the 1934 version of the film? Is it very different? I’d be interested to watch it to see the differences, when Hitchcock was asked about the two versions he had this to say: “Let’s say the first version is the work of a talented amateur and the second was made by a professional.”
Have you seen this movie? What did you think of it and how it compared to other Hitchcock movies?
Image source and copyright: 1, This work is in the public domain because it was published in the United States between 1923 and 1963 and although there may or may not have been a copyright notice, the copyright was not renewed. 2, 3 This work is in the public domain in that it was published in the United States between 1923 and 1977 and without a copyright notice.
I saw this film years ago and I loved it!
But I may be biased because I’m a keen Hitchcock fan as well as a 1950s fashion nut. And all that beautiful techicolour makes me giddy with delight!
I’m both of those things too – and admittedly the technicolour is gorgeous, but this movie just left me completely cold. It’s the only Hitch movie I haven’t liked though! 🙂
I’ll have to watch it again and I’ll be back with an updated opinion.
I’m putting it on my list as we speak and heading over to finish viewing the 39 Steps which I haven’t seen before but like so far very much.
We Heart Vintage blog: retro fashion, cinema and photography | Movie Tuesday: Dial M For Murder (1954)
[…] And that’s just a strange story line told using unlikeable characters, as you might remember me complaining a while back. Actually that’s probably a good definition of a bad movie isn’t it?! Dial F for Fail […]